Friday, January 30, 2009

Leningrad Then and Now

Really cool website where the photographer has superimposed images of Leningrad circa WWII with pictures from today:

http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/featured/leningrads-past-haunt/6938

Oil Companies are Screwing Us

This really pisses me off:
"But in a year where oil rose to a record before having its steepest-ever collapse, Exxon still managed to set a record as the most-profitable American corporation. The company earned $45.2 billion in 2008, up from $40.6 billion in 2007."

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Cool Stop Motion Video

Via SpliceToday.com

Does Obama Sound 'Elitist' Now?

Now this is a guy that we can relate to.
'“Even as he is sober about these challenges, I have never seen him happier,” Mr. Axelrod said. “The chance to be under the same roof with his kids, essentially to live over the store, to be able to see them whenever he wants, to wake up with them, have breakfast and dinner with them — that has made him a very happy man.”'

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

You Shouldn't Be Against Immigration in NY

Not if you're the recently appointed Senator, that is. According to the Times, Kirsten Gillibrand's anti-immigrant stance is drawing fire from immigration groups. She opposes any type of amnesty for illegal immigrants; sought to make English the official language of the US; opposed giving drivers' lisences to illegal immigrants; and was, according to the Times, given a "B" grade from Americans for Better Immigration, which supports tougher immigration laws.

These views are fine to have, but not if you live in a state where more than 16% of the residents are Hispanic, according to the US Census Bureau. On top of that, New York is a very liberal state: only 3 of its 29 congressional delegates are Republican. What means is that some New York Democrats are more conservative than, say, their California counterparts.

But it also means there's not much room to maneuver to the right. Representing a conservative Congressional district in eastern New York, with approximately 600,000 constituents, is a lot different than representing a whole state, especially when you've got a city of 8,000,000 very liberal people to consider.

I'm not saying that Gillibrand will fail. But I am saying that, in light of her pretty conservative views towards gun control and immigration, she's got a lot of political reconsideration to do. Her constituency just changed dramatically and if she wants to represent New York State as a whole, she'll have to change her viewpoints. She's a politician, she can do it. The only question is whether she will.

THIS is What's Wrong With New York:

The poor trophy wives who married Wall Street bankers are having troubles of their own, according to the New York Times. About 30 of the poor gals have started meeting regularly, and they even have their own blog:

'In addition to meeting once or twice weekly for brunch or drinks at a bar or restaurant, the group has a blog, billed as “free from the scrutiny of feminists,” that invites women to join “if your monthly Bergdorf’s allowance has been halved and bottle service has all but disappeared from your life.”'
Their lives sound so tragic. It always amazes me that people like this exist. But there are lots of them, and their population density is high in these parts. Lucky me.

So This is what "Increased Government Spending" looks like...

The proposed economic stimulus that’s currently sitting in Congress waiting for votes is, by any measure, huge. The New York Times reports that the bailout promises to reshape government roles in both education and healthcare.

Education:
"The proposed emergency expenditures on nearly every realm of education, including school renovation, special education, Head Start and grants to needy college students, would amount to the largest increase in federal aid since Washington began to spend significantly on education after World War II."

And healthcare:
"As Congress rushes to inject cash into a listless economy, it is setting aside many of the restraints that have checked new domestic spending for more than a decade. The White House said the changes contemplated by Congress would provide coverage for nearly 8.5 million newly uninsured people who had lost their jobs and would protect Medicaid for many more whose eligibility would otherwise be at risk.

Of the $127 billion cost, the Congressional Budget Office said, $87 billion would be used to increase the federal share of Medicaid, $29 billion would subsidize private insurance and $11 billion would finance Medicaid for unemployed workers who could not otherwise qualify."

This is the first in-depth look many non-experts have had at the bill, and even for someone who wholeheartedly supports Obama and the bailouts, these numbers are just enormous and give one pause. Doubling the federal budget on education? Providing 8.5 million uninsured people with insurance? Incredible.

I’ve been so used to government refusing to spend more money on education and healthcare for the past 8 years that these statistics are a bit shocking. I hope the Democrats know that they’re talking about. If not, we’re all in trouble.

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Andrew Cuomo on the Attack

Andrew Cuomo, NY State's Attorney General and until recently one of the frontrunners for the just-filled New York Senate seat, has subpoenaed John Thain. Thain is the ex-Merrill Lynch CEO who allegedly authorized bonus payments worth some $3 billion mere days before Merrill was acquired by Bank of America.

Problems at Merrill Lynch have been a primary cause of Bank of America's current problems, which have led to BoA requesting billions of dollars in bailout money. Indeed, Merrill Lynch's losses, according to the New York Times, were more than $15 billion. Those losses are now on BoA's books. Aware of the losses, Thain nonetheless doled out the company-wide bonuses before BoA could do anything to stop them.

Cuomo wants to find out why the bonuses were paid out nearly a month earlier than they had been in previous years. I don't know the specific legal issues involved, but I'm guessing that it's probably not OK to knowingly give out billions of dollars in bonuses when your company is losing money by the fistful, knowing full well that taxpayers are going to be on the hook.

This makes me really despise Thain.

It also makes me like Cuomo. I wasn’t a big fan of Caroline Kennedy and I don’t know much about Kirsten Gillibrand, but Cuomo seems to be more than competent at his job. He was the one who took the lead in investigating the Long Island Railroad retirement scandal, which has actually led to charges against ex-L.I.R.R. officials.

After the recent Senate appointment debacle, Gov. Paterson is the one who comes out looking like a doofus. Cuomo is untainted by Paterson’s screw-up and he’s now out with his guns blazing. Not a bad day’s work for the current AG and potentially soon-to-be-governor-of-New York.

SpliceToday blog

To My Loyal Reader,

Starting this week, I'm going to start doing a bit of blogging for SpliceToday.com. Both in content and form, the postings will be substantially similar to this blog. There are several bloggers that will be contributing, and eventually we'll all coalesce into something that we're tentatively calling Gray Matter. I'm more than excited for the opportunity. The upshot is that, for the time being, I'll be posting less frequently on here. That could change as I get my legs under me at SpliceToday and figure out the types of things they want to cover, but for now it might be a little quieter around here.

Cheers,
Ian

The Floodgates Have Opened....for now

In this joyful article, the Washington Post recaps Obama's first week in office:
"In his first seven days in office, Obama has banned the use of controversial CIA interrogation tactics, ordered the closure of the U.S. military prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and begun planning for the drawdown of troops in Iraq. He also imposed stringent limits on lobbyists, unveiled an $825 billion stimulus plan, and ordered a halt to any last-minute rules and regulations put in place by his predecessor."

Music to my ears/eyes/senses. Eventually his ambitions will run up against reality, but for now let's enjoy the sensation of an elected official following through on his promises.

Monday, January 26, 2009

Weekends in New York

Friday was a teaser: 50 degrees and sunny. Then it got progressively colder as the weekend dragged on. Contrary to popular opinion, I think that warm days in the middle of January are depressing. You're given one really nice day but the niceness only makes you think how crappy it's going to be the next day, when you're freezing again. It's like being given slice of pizza but only being allowed to eat one bite.

Friday night I saw that Leo/Kate reunion movie, Revolutionary Road. It was pretty good. Kate Winslet is a terrific actress, and Leo's pretty good too. I've always liked both of them, but I felt that the transition from book to movie was a bit awkward this time. I went with a friend who's read the book and she said quite a bit was missing. The night as a whole was fun though, as I spent time with some friends I haven't seen in a while.

Saturday night I was supposed to hang out with Ashley and some of her girlfriends but instead hung out with two of her male roomates. I hadn't met them before but we had a good "dude" time.

Yesterday I was ridiculously productive: cleaned the apartment; went grocery shopping; got some stuff with Ashley for her new apartment; helped make dinner; packed lunch for today...the list goes on. Anyway, a good weekend that happily wasn't ruined by teasingly warm weather.

Coffee Prevents Dementia??

So says at least one study:
"After controlling for numerous socioeconomic and health factors, including high cholesterol and high blood pressure, the scientists found that the subjects who had reported drinking three to five cups of coffee daily were 65 percent less likely to have developed dementia, compared with those who drank two cups or less. People who drank more than five cups a day also were at reduced risk of dementia, the researchers said, but there were not enough people in this group to draw statistically significant conclusions."

The study makes no mention of the social repurcussions: legions of red-eyed coffee maniacs swamping local Starbucks' and roaming the streets late at night in search of their next caffeine fix.

Friday, January 23, 2009

Fox News is Scared of Obama

Stewart: "If you don't stick to your values when you're being tested...they're not values! They're hobbies."

Oh Boy...Did I Speak Too Soon?

A list from Eve Fairbanks of 10 Things We All Didn't Know About Kirsten Gillibrand. As you'll see, it's not too comforting for we NYC libs:

"2. She bucked House leadership by voting against both versions of the TARP bailout bill in the fall.

3. A big gun supporter, she's been given a 100% approval rating by the NRA -- she's one of the extremely few Democrats on a federal level to win official NRA endorsement -- and, this fall, she voted in favor of a controversial bill to repeal District of Columbia laws prohibiting the possession of semiautomatics."

From the sound of this my grandfather would love her. As for me...well, at least she's a Democrat, right? Still, it looks like she tacks farther to the right than Hillary did, and it's a shame to have a moderate Democrat come from such a liberal state as New York. She'd fit better in, I don't know, Virginia or New Mexico or something.

I guess it came down to political calculation for Paterson. He wanted votes from upstate NY, where she's from, in his coming re-election battle in 2010, and he wanted support from women. Hopefully for him and for the rest of us Gillibrand doesn't turn into Sarah Palin of the Left. What a scary thought.

And the Next Senator from New York IS:

Kirsten Gillibrand. According to the Times, she was chosen by Gov. Paterson to replace Hillary's seat in the Senate. She'll have to run for reelection in 2010 and 2012. I know nothing about her except the fact that 1) she's a Democrat; and 2) she's a woman.

I'm glad that Paterson chose a woman to replace Hillary. The Senate is one of the last vestiges of Old White Dude political power. There's only one black man in the Senate, and now only 17 women. Now that the presidency can no longer be considered a WASP position, and the House has got its share of minority and female members, it's time to fully integrate the Senate. Good job Paterson!

Well, This Complicates Things...

The New York Times reports that Said Ali al-Shihri, a former Guantanamo Bay detainee that was released to Saudi Arabia in 2007, has become al-Qaeda's head honcho on Yemen. Yikes. Maybe the closing of Gitmo really isn't going to be as simple as most of us want it to be. There are some undeniably bad people down there, people that are our enemies and that should be either put in prison or otherwise neutralized.

So Bush/Cheney was right about one thing - we are being threatened by nasty, potentially unreformable people. But by torturing the detainees and leaving them in legal limbo, Bush/Cheney jeopardized the very thing that they were trying to protect: our safety. As more Guantanamo and other secret prison torture cases come to light and more of them are thrown out of court, like this one, you have the potential that really dangerous guys get put out on the street and end up as al-Qaeda commanders.

Now that Obama wants to close Guantanamo, the thorny question of what to do with these prisoners becomes a real problem. The Bush administration refused to deal with the question, as it refused to deal with all other questions, and was happy to hold the men indefinitely. It's not going to be that easy for Obama. Do you let these guys out on the street and cross your fingers that they don't become terrorists? Do you try them in civilian court and risk losing? What if you "know" that someone is a terrorist but, due to torture or other evidence problems, you can't "prove" it. Then what?

These are tough questions and they make me glad that I'm not in Obama's shoes right now.

Thursday, January 22, 2009

Rich People Always Forget to Pay Taxes

I was wrong about Caroline Kennedy. She didn't drop out, according to the New York Times, because she couldn't take the heat. She dropped out due to "problems involving taxes and a household employee." I guess she, like Timothy Geithner, failed to pay enough taxes on her considerable (though still-secret) income. Also like Geithner, it's possible she employed an illegal immigrant as a housekeeper. In national politics, that's a no-no.

For me, this only confirms that Kennedy was a bad choice for NY Senator. At least Geithner has the job of Chairman of the New York Fed on his resume. His errors probably weren't due to incompetance. Hers...well you can't be sure one way or the other.

Her candidacy has been a joke from the beginning, from her liberal use of the phrase "you know" in an interview to her disastrous response to reporters' queries about her motivations - she angrily asked why the reporters didn't write for a women's magazine. Doesn't sound very feminist to me. Doesn't sound very senatorial, either.

The Oscars

The Oscar nominations were released today. Looks like Benjamin Button is the big winner thus far with 13 nominations. The other nominations for Best Pic are Frost/Nixon, Milk, The Reader, and Slumdog Millionaire.

I saw one pretty good movie (Gran Torino) and one really good movie (The Wrestler) over the weekend. Clint Eastwood (directed and starred in Torino) is simply The Man. A real-life BAMF. Half of his lines in his newest movie are, literally, growls, but he's the one guy that could pull that off. Mickey Rourke, who is the wrestler in The Wrestler, is amazing, and he was rewarded with a nomination for Best Actor. His was the best movie I've seen this year.

I've been wanting to see Slumdog for quite a while but the girlfriend has been less than enthusiastic about joining me. Now that the nominations are out I think I can convince her to go with me. I guess I'll have to see Ben Button, too, now that it's so nomination-heavy. And The Reader too. Ah, the cultural conscience of an uppity white kid.

Can't Stand to Lose, Can We?

Caroline Kennedy officially withdrew from the pseudo-race for Hillary Clinton's vacated NY Senate seat due to "personal reasons." This shouldn't come as a surprise. All her life, Kennedy's been riding the coattails of her famous name and relatives. She thought that all she had to do to become a Senator was declare that she wanted to be one.

When she realized it would actually take hard work and a bit of skill that she seemed to lack, she did what you'd expect any self-entitled child to do: she quit. New Yorkers should breathe a sigh of relief. After all, if a Senatorial candidate can't take the stress of a campaign, how is she going to take the stress of the job itself? What if one of her bills didn't pass; would she just 'quit' the Senate?

Of course there might be other reasons why Kennedy withdrew her name from consideration. Maybe her kids really didn't want her to run. Maybe she's concerned about her uncle, Ted Kennedy, and wants to spend more time with him and the rest of her family. But even if that were the case, shouldn't she have made that decision back in December rather than half-assing it until the end of January?

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

The Bailout needs Bailing Out

Timothy Geithner, PRESIDENT Obama's Treasury Secretary nominee, said today during testimony before a Senate panel that the bailout measures passed late last year needed serious overhauling:
"'Many people believe the program has allowed too much upside for financial institutions, while doing too little for small business owners, families who are struggling to keep their jobs and make ends meet, and innocent homeowners,' Geithner said."

I don't think bailing out big financial institutions was a mistake. After all, look what the collapse of Bear Sterns and Lehman Bro's did to the economy as a whole. But I find it refreshing that a powerful government official is actually concerned about helping individuals. Not out of charity, but out of necessity.

That's something that the Bush administration and the rest of the neocons refuse/d to acknowledge. Helping individuals helps everyone, including the Fat Cats. Only helping the Fat Cats doesn't necessarily help anyone else out. Trickle down doesn't work. It didn't work in the 1930s and it didn't work in the 2000s.

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

The Inauguration

What else can I say other than it was awesome?

Friday, January 16, 2009

I Joined Twitter

...and I'm not sure how I feel about it. My friend Dave encouraged me to sign up. I haven't updated my status and don't feel the need to. Everyone says it's easy to get addicted, but I don't see it yet.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

A Ridiculous Ant Colony

Via SpliceToday

The Supreme Court Sucks

The Supreme Court ruled today, in a 5-4 decision along the usual idiot/liberal lines (Kennedy going with the idiots), that evidence collected by police due to police mistakes can be used against defendants.

The decision came in a case where police mistakenly arrested a man named Bennie Herring of Alabama. During the arrest, they found meth and an empty gun in his car. It turned out, however, that the arrest warrant that the officers used to arrest Herring had been revoked months before. The police's database had not been updated to reflect the change.

I'm no legal scholar, and I'm not saying that Herring is a good guy. I mean, anyone who's driving around with meth and a gun in their car is probably up to no good. But the greater point is that now anyone, including you and me, can be arrested "by mistake" and whatever evidence is collected can be used against us.

The police are powerful enough as it is. We shouldn't be giving them even more power by rewarding their ineptitude. You might hear people argue that "you shouldn't be carrying any illegal stuff on you at all, or keep anything bad in your house." But that's missing the bigger point. This case was about more than drugs and guns. It was about taking away rights from the people and giving it to the government.

In a democracy you can't keep giving government more power at the expense of citizens. That isn't the way democracy should work, and it's contrary to the American idea of individual freedom. Of course you shouldn't be carrying unregistered guns or drugs, but I think it's just as obvious that the police shouldn't be able to hold that against you if they discovered it by mistake.

There are certainly limitations to my argument. If you're kidnapping someone or if you're carrying a bomb, that's an entirely different story. But are we really ready to give up a right as important as the right to a competent police force? Over a small amount of meth and an unloaded gun?

It's About Time

According to the Washington Post, Susan B. Crawford, who's in charge of prosecuting the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, determined that the supposed "20th hijacker," Mohammed al-Qahtani, had been tortured while in US custody:


"His treatment met the legal definition of torture. And that's why I did not refer the case" for prosecution.

More from the WaPo:

"For 160 days his only contact was with the interrogators," said Crawford, who personally reviewed Qahtani's interrogation records and other military documents. "Forty-eight of 54 consecutive days of 18-to-20-hour interrogations. Standing naked in front of a female agent. Subject to strip searches. And insults to his mother and sister."

At one point he was threatened with a military working dog named Zeus, according to a military report. Qahtani "was forced to wear a woman's bra and had a thong placed on his head during the course of his interrogation" and "was told that his mother and sister were whores." With a leash tied to his chains, he was led around the room "and forced to perform a series of dog tricks," the report shows."

It's about time that we fessed up. I can't be the only one who's ashamed and astonished by the fact that Americans, on an American military base, would do such things to our prisoners - even ones who tried to attack us. Part of what makes us Americans is our morality. It's disgusting and shameful and should be punished.

After 7 years of torture, Qahtani isn't the same person he was in 2001. His lawyers, according to the New York Times, say he is a "broken man" and has attempted suicide. Having read about the effects of torture on people in college and in Naomi Klein's book "The Shock Doctrine," I don't doubt that his lawyers are telling the truth.

In more practical terms, our decision to torture Qahtani prevented us from prosecuting him for his alleged crimes. So by torturing the guy we actually made ourselves less safe because now we have someone whom we can't try in a court of law, but who at one time was a grave threat to all of us. How can the interrogators have believed that what they were doing was acceptable? That it was even useful? Such a belief could only have come from the very top.

What do we do with him now? Crawford herself isn't sure. She doesn't want to just let him out on the street, and military prosecutors plan to bring other charges that rely on evidence other than the interrogations. Adding a big new wrinkle is Obama's plan to close Guantanamo Bay as soon as he can. But before he does that he's going to have to figure out what to do with people like Qahtani.

I hope that there's some sort of solution. We need to keep America safe but it undermines everything we stand for if we torture our prisoners. At the end of the day, we're safer if we use our power judiciously and not punitatively.

Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Toad the Wet Sprocket - Walk on the Ocean

A song from my favorite music era - the early to mid 90s. Enjoy.

Bush's Ignorance

A recently released study found that ideology affected hiring practices at the Justice Department from 2001 -2007. In particular, the study found that a man named Bradley Schlozman, a Deputy Assistant Attorney General, altered the hiring process to weed out candidates with perceived ties to liberal organizations.

I’d be shocked if this came as a big surprise to anyone. The Justice Department’s hiring process caused a scandal a few years ago and led to the resignation of then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. It was only a matter of time before investigations “proved” what everyone already knew.

If we take away any lessons from the past eight years, it should be that insulating oneself from dissenting opinions is an easy way to screw everything up. Bush, Cheney, and their cronies systematically eliminated dissenting opinions at all levels of government. Their willful ignorance led directly to the disaster in Iraq; to torture; to the failures during Hurricane Katrina, and maybe even to our current economic problems.

The Bush administration is so insulated from dissenting opinion that, even in his last press conference, Bush himself refused to admit that America’s standing in the world had suffered. He’s either lying or completely, blissfully ignorant. I’m not sure which is worse. But I am sure that the way the Bush administration went about governance was disastrous for America and harmful to the world. I hope Obama, and all of our future presidents, can learn from the terrible mistakes.

How City Life Isn't Good for Us

A couple of months ago I speculated about humans’ relationship with nature and the craziness of city life. Here, Jonah Lehrer does a better job:
"When a park is properly designed, it can improve the function of the brain within minutes. As the Berman study demonstrates, just looking at a natural scene can lead to higher scores on tests of attention and memory. While people have searched high and low for ways to improve cognitive performance, from doping themselves with Red Bull to redesigning the layout of offices, it appears that few of these treatments are as effective as simply taking a walk in a natural place."

Hitchens Hates Hillary

Christopher Hitchens at Slate wants the Senate to reject Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State. He says:

"Why is Sen. Clinton, the spouse of the great influence-peddler, being nominated in the first place? In exchange for giving the painful impression that our State Department will be an attractive destination for lobbyists and donors, what exactly are we getting? George Marshall? Dean Acheson? Even Madeleine Albright? No, we are getting a notoriously ambitious woman who made a fool of herself over Bosnia, at the time and during the recent campaign, and who otherwise has no command of foreign affairs except what she's picked up second-hand from an impeached ex-president, a disbarred lawyer, and a renter of the Lincoln Bedroom."

The guy has a point. I’ve never been a big fan of H.C., and her ridiculous performance in this election cycle didn’t win me over. That being said, I think Hitchens underestimates Hillary’s abilities and overestimates Bill Clinton’s potential influence on Obama’s administration.

Since when does the Secretary of State dictate foreign policy? Condoleeza Rice is an extreme example of how impotent a Secretary can be. I doubt Hillary will be as toothless, but I can’t imagine her openly defying Obama on questions of importance. He’s the boss, and if she’s openly insubordinate to a successful and popular president, she’s not going to win herself any votes in 2012 or 2016. She’s smart enough to realize that, and so is Obama, and so is Bill.

I don’t think Obama’s team is, as Hitchens puts it, “wide eyed.” They dealt with the bad Bill Clinton during the primary, after all (I’m thinking of the “race card” incident). They know he has uncomfortably close ties with all kinds of shady foreign characters. Obama was adept at handling both Clinton’s during the primaries when he was their rival. What makes Hitchens so sure that he’ll be unable to manage them when he’s the Boss Man?

Goodbye to (hopefully) the last Bush

President Bush held his last press conference yesterday. When asked what he'd be doing in the future, he only said: “When I get out of here, I’m getting off the stage, I’ve had my time in the klieg lights.”

All I can say is thank goodness.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Oh yeah...Happy New Year

Wishing everyone a healthy and happy 2009. And what a season/year it's shaping up to be for Philadelphia sports fans. The Phillies send the Mets home and win the World Series...and the Eagles are in the NFC championship game after defeating the hated NY Giants. Man, you couldn't write this!

Go Eagles!

Back from Whistler

Well we all survived the week-long trip to Whistler, B.C. relatively unscathed. I learned how out of shape I've become over the past year. Apparently sitting in a cubicle 7 hours per day isn't very good for your leg strength. I learned a few more things, too:

--Delta sucks. They charge 50 bucks for extra bags, aren't very friendly, the seats are cramped, and it took our bags 1 hour to come to baggage claim when we arrived in Philadelphia.

--Southwest is as good as advertised. Tickets are cheap, no charge for extra bags, staff is friendly. The seats are pretty cramped, but they do give you cool little Ritz snacks for free.

--Seattle's pretty cool. At least I think it is, having driven past it twice.

--Washington State is beautiful. The whole Pacific Northwest has a very different feel than South Jersey. Very wet (it rained on the trip back), dark green, and lots of water. Plus the mountains. It made the 5 hour trip to and from Whistler easier to handle.

--Skiing rules. It just does. Tiring, but so relaxing. I feel much more refreshed after this week-long trip to Whistler than I did after my sojourn to England. Maybe it's the fact that it's my second week off in the past 6 weeks. But I do think that the skiing itself has something to do with it. That's a valuable lesson going forward, I think.

--Work isn't so bad. I mean...I have a job. I have an apartment. Life's good.

--New York is funny. I'm slowly getting into things over here. The heat in my apartment's out, I'm having a mini-dispute with my landlord over broken doors, and a coworker of mine complains constantly about the overly loud copulating couple in the apartment next to hers. Seems appropriate somehow.

--Anyway, back to work. Back to blogging (sort of). Back to reality.